It’s Pride month: Does your company actually care, or is it just June?

Workplace inclusivity requires shifting from performative rainbows to concrete healthcare and insurance benefits.

It is June, which means that another annual and very predictable transformation has taken place in the corporate landscape. Temporary rainbows of corporate logos have bloomed across the country, PR departments are churning out statements on allyship, and diversity panels are full of celebratory applause.

However, as the general public and the workforce become more knowledgeable about the nuances of structural equity, a critical question emerges: Does your company care, or is it just June?

Historically, corporate participation in Pride was largely celebratory—sponsoring colorful floats, releasing limited-edition merchandise, or hosting talks. 

Now, employees, labor advocates, and consumer groups are calling for material equity. True intersectional inclusivity recognizes that LGBTQ+ employees are not lone wolves, but their work productivity is inextricably tied to their socioeconomic and family security. For a policy to be structural and not performative, it should protect an employee’s chosen family legally and financially.

More inclusive benefits

In the Philippines, the absolute acid test for corporate accountability is the expansion of health maintenance organization (HMO) and life insurance benefits to same-sex and domestic partners.

Because the Philippine Family Code strictly defines marriage as a union between a man and a woman, same-sex couples are legally barred from state-backed marital protections. 

Government entities like the Social Security System (SSS) and GSIS are bound by these national statutes, meaning they do not recognize same-sex partners as legal beneficiaries. To bridge this massive institutional gap, private progressive corporations are taking it upon themselves to rewrite internal HR policies.

Equality pioneers 

The pioneers of this movement have predictably been multinational corporations (MNCs) and business process outsourcing (BPO) hubs. Giants like Nestlé, Accenture, Manulife, and Home Credit explicitly allow employees to enroll same-sex partners as primary health dependents. 

They bypass standard marriage certificate requirements, accepting alternative legal verifications like a notarized affidavit of domestic partnership to establish a sworn statement of financial interdependence.

Now, traditionally conservative domestic firms are following suit to remain competitive. Globe Telecom made a landmark breakthrough by formally extending medical, life insurance, and bereavement benefits to same-sex dependents of regular employees who legally contracted a union in countries where same-sex partnerships are recognized. 

Meanwhile, large healthcare aggregators like Maxicare and Intellicare and newer insurtech platforms like Hive Health have reconfigured their B2B models. Now they allow corporate clients to toggle “domestic partner” eligibility riders for their workforces, shifting the execution entirely to what an employer is willing to fund.

Legal and structural hurdles

But the legislative stalemate still poses serious legal and structural obstacles. Because the state does not recognize same-sex partnerships, the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) considers the cost of the HMO coverage that the company provides for a same-sex partner as a taxable fringe benefit (which is taxed at 35% for managers) or as part of the regular taxable compensation of the rank-and-file workers. And that is an additional tax burden that married couples who are not heterosexual do not have to pay.

The national SOGIE equality bill is still frustratingly stuck in Congress, but progressive local government units are filling in the gap. Cities like Quezon City and San Juan have institutionalized the “Right to Care Card.” Operating via a notarized Special Power of Attorney (SPA), this card empowers queer resident couples to legally make critical medical decisions and admissions on behalf of their partners in participating hospitals.

The baseline has officially shifted. Top Gen Z and Millennial workers in the Philippines are actively auditing their workplaces and declining job offers from firms that engage in “pinkwashing” while denying healthcare to their families. 

Inclusion is no longer a corporate perk to be displayed for 30 days in June; it is a baseline talent acquisition strategy. If your company’s allyship vanishes when the calendar turns to July, it isn’t progressive—it is just performative.

READ: