EXPLAINER: Can Mariel Padilla wear a doctoral graduation gown without earning a doctorate?

Her choice of graduation attire sparks debate over academic tradition and courtesy protocols.

Mariel Rodriguez-Padilla’s appearance at a college graduation has sparked an unexpected debate—not about the speech she delivered, but about the academic regalia she wore.

The television host attended the graduation ceremony of the Teodoro M. Luansing College of Rosario in Batangas as a proxy for her husband, Senator Robin Padilla, who had been invited as the commencement speaker but was unable to attend.

Photos from the ceremony, however, drew criticism after Mariel was seen wearing what appeared to be doctoral academic regalia, complete with the distinctive three velvet sleeve bars traditionally associated with holders of doctoral degrees.

The images quickly circulated online, with academics, graduates, and netizens arguing that doctoral regalia represents years of advanced study, research, and scholarship, and should not be worn by someone who has not earned the degree.

So, is it actually prohibited?

Generally, academic tradition says yes. Around the world, academic regalia is more than ceremonial clothing—it serves as a visual symbol of educational achievement. The design of the gown, hood, and sleeve bars indicates the academic degree attained, with doctoral regalia reserved for those who have completed the highest level of university education.

While wearing such regalia is not illegal, doing so in formal academic settings is generally discouraged because it may misrepresent a person’s academic credentials and diminish the significance of those who earned the distinction.

However, Mariel’s situation also falls into one of the recognized exceptions.

Universities occasionally provide academic regalia to commencement speakers or members of the official stage party, even if they do not possess the degree represented by the gown. The practice is largely ceremonial, intended to maintain a uniform appearance onstage rather than to confer or imply an academic qualification.

This courtesy is especially common when the guest is an invited speaker, honorary guest, or official representative of the commencement speaker.

In Mariel’s case, she attended as the designated representative of Senator Robin Padilla and delivered his commencement address on his behalf. If the institution itself provided the regalia, its purpose would have been ceremonial—to ensure she blended visually with university officials and faculty during the graduation rites.

That said, the criticism highlights an important distinction.

Academic experts note that courtesy regalia is different from claiming or implying ownership of a degree. Problems arise only when someone wears academic attire to falsely represent educational credentials or gain professional prestige.

The controversy has also renewed discussion about graduation protocols. Some observers believe institutions should provide guest speakers with neutral ceremonial robes or clearly distinguish guest attire from earned doctoral regalia to avoid confusion and preserve the symbolism attached to academic dress.

Ultimately, the debate is less about Mariel herself than about the traditions surrounding academic regalia. While universities may extend ceremonial exceptions for official guests and commencement speakers, the gowns remain enduring symbols of academic achievement—one reason many scholars continue to regard them with deep respect.

READ: