Critics are pushing back against “band-aid” solutions as commuters demand a more robust public transport system.
While rising fuel costs may push commuters toward carpooling as a temporary fix, the proposal faces backlash for potentially sidelining deeper transport reforms.
The Metropolitan Manila Development Authority (MMDA) aims to launch a point-to-point, time-restricted carpooling system after the Lenten break. Under this plan, regulated private vehicles would transport passengers during specific windows.
The carpooling framework
The MMDA plans to limit carpooling trips to two daily rush-hour windows: 6AM to 9AM and 5PM to 9PM. To prevent competition with traditional public transport, the system will use fixed pick-up and drop-off points.
The resistance: A “colorum” loophole?
The MMDA will prohibit fare collection, though it may later introduce cost-recovery schemes. Officials emphasize that the plan will not legitimize “colorum” (unlicensed) vehicles.
However, transport groups warn that weak enforcement could lead to overlapping routes. This poses a threat to drivers who already struggle to earn ₱200 a day amid soaring fuel prices.
Seeking long-term mobility
Critics argue the proposal treats symptoms rather than the root cause. They insist the government should prioritize mass public transport over short-term measures. Because Metro Manila relies so heavily on roads, experts believe only long-term solutions—such as expanding rail systems, improving bus networks, and modernizing jeepneys—will truly lower commuter costs and improve mobility.
The MMDA aims to launch a point-to-point, time-restricted carpooling system after the Lenten break. Under this plan, regulated private vehicles would transport passengers during specific windows.
